abstract:
FILIPPO CAMEROTA
Teaching
Euclid in a practical context: Linear perspective and practical Geometry
In 1573 Egnazio Danti published the first Italian
translation of Euclid’s Optics, lamenting a severe decline
in interest in this discipline “among men of science”. According
to the Medicean cosmographer, the situation was so critical that, in
order to learn the principles of “prospettiva” (i.e., optics),
“we may no longer go the Philosopher’s schools to learn
it, since it has been banished from them, but the little which remains
to us is limited to some practical aspects learned from the mechanical
artificers”. After the great Medieval season of optical studies
conducted by philosophers from the Universities of Oxford and Paris
the science of vision returned, in effect, to occupy the minds of scientists
only at the beginning of the 17th century, with the work of Kepler and
the dissemination of Galileo’s telescope. In the intermediate
period, geometric optics progressed mainly through its practical applications,
especially through “that part of perspective which pertains to
painting”, termed “prospectiva pingendi” by Piero
della Francesca, and through the spread of methods and instruments for
measuring by sight. The “mechanical artificers” mentioned
by Danti were architects, painters or surveyors whose mathematical training
constitutes the subject dealt with in this article. A determinant role
in the teaching of the Euclidean principles (Elements and Optics)
– presumably also for perfecting the rules of pictorial perspective
– was played first by the abacus masters, then by the mathematicians
linked to the artists’ workshops (Luca Pacioli, Ostilio Ricci),
and lastly by the “readers” of Euclid in the new academic
institutions of the 16th century.
|